Comenius   Multilateral  Partnership

 

Stage 1.- Evaluation of the partnership meeting

 

Project

Comenius Multilateral Partnership

Name

OMAC

Country and City visited

Romania  -  Bucharest

Date

26th April – 1st May 2009

 

 

A)  Were the aim and the objectives of the meeting clear?

Yes 9

 

 

B)  Did you feel the aims of the meeting were met?

Yes 9

 

 

Rate the answer 1-5 where 1 is poor and 5 is excellent

1

2

3

4

5

C)  There was sufficient time allocated for the meetings

 

 

 

2

7

D)  The visit to the learning center was informative

 

 

 

 

8

E)  I enjoyed the social and cultural programme

 

 

 

1

7

F)  There was a good balance between social and business activities

 

 

 

2

4

G)  The information I received from the host country was adequate

 

 

 

 

8

H)  Should partners do anything differently for next meeting?

No  5

Yes 1 (not specified)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stage 2 – Evaluation of the effectiveness of meetings

Part A to be completed at the end of the partner meeting

 

Rate the answer 1-5 where 1 is poor and 5 is excellent

1

2

3

4

5

1a. Group members worked well together

 

 

2

2

5

1b.  If you scored 1-3 please comment why, if you scored 4-5 give examples of effective working

·        They had possibility to exchange information

·        To increase actual results and number of discussing members

·        Discussing in the workshop and the project meetings

·        The group is too big and the knowledge of English is not sufficient among some participants

·        The dictionary

 

2a. I was given the opportunity to contribute to the meetings

 

 

 

1

8

3a. I was able to contribute to the meetings

 

 

 

3

6

4a There was mutual respect between team members

 

 

1

1

7

4b. If you scored 1-3 please state how this could be improved

The knowledge of aims of the project should be increased by some teachers participants.

 

 

 

5a. I feel progress has been made in comparison with the project plan

 

 

 

 

9

5b. If you scored 1-3 please state why and how this could be improved

 

 

 

 

6a I am better informed about some learning environments in other countries I visited

 

 

 

1

7

6b. Please share your experience

We visited some classes and learnt more about educational system; Sharing learning situations; This Romanian institution was very interesting for us; To compare educational systems, we saw different ways of teaching. It was a new experience to visit a school with bilingual curriculum. Lessons, classes, rooms visited.

 

 

7a. I am more aware of some of the constraints/barriers which exist in a multi-cultural project

 

 

 

2

5

7b. Give examples of some of the constraints/barriers encountered

Language barrier;**  The number of people using lingua franca was risen. The great number of participants.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Part B to be completed at the end of  the partner meeting

 

Rate the answer 1-5 where 1 is poor and 5 is excellent

1

2

3

4

5

8.a I was clear about the activities/tasks that I had to perform between meetings

 

1

 

1

7

8.b If you scored 1-3 please state why this was the case and how this could be improved

We propose to document the agreed content of discussed tasks, right after the discussion.

 

 

 

9.a I was able to complete the tasks between meetings

 

 

1

2

6

9.b If you scored 1-3 please state the reasons for not being able to complete all the tasks

Most teachers are working so intensive in regular duties.

 

 

 

10.a I was able to communicate easily with other members between meetings

 

 

 

4

5

10.b List the communication method you used:

Debates, talks, e-mails, dynamic website, speaking, internet, chatting, body languages, telephone.

 

 

 

 

 

 back