Comenius   Multilateral  Partnership

 

Stage 1.- Evaluation of the partnership meeting

 

Project

Comenius Multilateral  Partnership

 

 

Name

OMAC -  Open minds for active citizenship

Country and City visited

Italy - Adria

Date

17th-21st February 2009

 

 

A)  Were the aim and the objectives of the meeting clear?

Yes   (8);        Not in every aspects  (1)

 

B)  Did you feel the aims of the meeting were met?

Yes   (7);     Most of them (2)  

 

 

Rate the answer 1-5 where 1 is poor and 5 is excellent

1

2

3

4

5

 

C)  There was sufficient time allocated for the meetings

 

 

2

1

6

 

D)  The visit to the learning center was informative

1

 

 

3

5

 

E)  I enjoyed the social and cultural programme

 

1

2

3

3

 

F)  There was a good balance between social and business activities

 

1

2

2

4

 

G)  The information I received from the host country was adequate

 

 

 

5

4

 

H)  Should partners do anything differently for next meeting?

 

NO ******          Students should stay with the families*

Clearer guidelines*     more concrete task plans*

To work faster*

 

 

 

 

 

Stage 2 – Evaluation of the effectiveness of meetings

Part A to be completed at the end of the partner meeting

 

Rate the answer 1-5 where 1 is poor and 5 is excellent

1

2

3

4

5

1a. Group members worked well together

 

 

1

2

6

1b.  If you scored 1-3 please comment why, if you scored 4-5 give examples of effective working

Partners should visit more historical and natural places*

It would have been better if more people had actively participated*

Exchanging of different ideas*

 

 

 

2a. I was given the opportunity to contribute to the meetings

 

 

 

2

7

3a. I was able to contribute to the meetings

 

 

1

2

6

4a There was mutual respect between team members

 

 

 

2

7

4b. If you scored 1-3 please state how this could be improved

 National anthems were wonderful*

 

 

 

5a. I feel progress has been made in comparison with the project plan

 

 

2

2

5

5b. If you scored 1-3 please state why and how this could be improved

Choosing logo was very enjoyable*

 

 

 

6a I am better informed about some learning environments in other countries I visited

1

 

 

3

5

6b. Please share your experience

Students are informed about learning environment because they attended classes*

No time for the team to visit classes*

The team work is a good way to learn*

 

 

7a. I am more aware of some of the constraints/barriers which exist in a multi-cultural project

 

 

1

3

5

7b. Give examples of some of the constraints/barriers encountered

 

Different working styles*

More activities for students*

Cultural differences*

Different levels in our lingua franca***

Wrong ideas about foreign and different countries*

Working in a big group**

 

 

 

 

Part B to be completed at the end of  the partner meeting

 

Rate the answer 1-5 where 1 is poor and 5 is excellent

1

2

3

4

5

8.a I was clear about the activities/tasks that I had to perform between meetings

1

 

1

1

6

8.b If you scored 1-3 please state why this was the case and how this could be improved

The tasks were not concrete enough (see dictionary)*

 

 

 

9.a I was able to complete the tasks between meetings

 

1

 

1

7

9.b If you scored 1-3 please state the reasons for not being able to complete all the tasks

Work local in relation with regular school lessons*

 

 

 

10.a I was able to communicate easily with other members between meetings

 

 

1

2

6

10.b List the communication method you used:

e-mail****, phone talks*, PC*, web site*

 

 

 

 

 back