Comenius OMAC
Debica –
Results (data processed:5th December,
2008)
Stage 1.- Evaluation of the partnership meeting
Project |
Comenius – Multilateral
patnership |
Name |
OMAC -
Open minds for active citizenship |
Country and City visited |
Poland - Debica |
Date |
21-25 October 2008 |
Were the aim and the objectives
of the meeting clear? Yes -
Nr. 9
- 100% |
Did you feel the aims of the
meeting were met? Yes -
Nr. 9
- 100% |
Rate the
answer 1-5 where 1 is poor and 5 is excellent |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
There was sufficient time
allocated for the meetings Nr |
|
|
|
4 |
5 |
|
The visit
to the learning center was informative
Nr |
|
|
|
2 |
7 |
|
I enjoyed
the social and cultural programme Nr |
|
|
|
5 |
4 |
|
There was
a good balance between social and business activities Nr |
|
|
1 |
2 |
6 |
|
The
information I received from the host country was adequate Nr |
|
|
|
1 |
7 |
|
Should
partners do anything differently for next meeting? No 6 Yes 1 (time for personal
introduction and presentations of personal project aims and ideas) 1 (longer time for the
meetings among partners) 1 |
|
|||||
Stage 2 –
Evaluation of the effectiveness of meetings
Part A to be
completed at the end of the partner meeting
Rate the
answer 1-5 where 1 is poor and 5 is excellent |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1a. Group
members worked well together |
|
|
1 |
2 |
6 |
1b. If you scored 1-3 please comment why, if
you scored 4-5 give examples of effective working Not everybody could
communicate in English 1 Effective work on
steps, aims, objectives and deadlines of the project 6 Organization and
content 1 Presentation by
students 1 |
|||||
2a. I was
given the opportunity to contribute to the meetings |
|
|
|
|
9 |
3a. I was
able to contribute to the meetings |
|
|
|
|
9 |
4a There
was mutual respect between team members |
|
|
|
|
9 |
4b. If
you scored 1-3 please state how this could be improved |
|||||
5a. I
feel progress has been made in comparison with the project plan |
|
|
|
1 |
8 |
5b. If
you scored 1-3 please state why and how this could be improved |
|||||
6a I am
better informed about some learning environments in other countries I visited (no answer 2) |
|
|
|
4 |
7 |
6b.
Please share your experience Informal talks 1 Our students shared
experience with students of host school
2 It is our first visit 1 Educational system is
quite similar in many European countries
1 No answers 4 |
|||||
7a. I am
more aware of some of the constraints/barriers which exist in a
multi-cultural project |
|
|
2 |
3 |
4 |
7b. Give
examples of some of the constraints/barriers encountered Different age of
students, languages, types of schools 1 Our student’s English
isn’t sufficient 1 Large number of
schools involved 1 Different teaching
experiences 1 Lack of time 1 Discovery of
similarities 1 No answers 3 |
Part B to be
completed at the end of the partner
meeting
Rate the
answer 1-5 where 1 is poor and 5 is excellent |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
8.a I was
clear about the activities/tasks that I had to perform between meetings
(no answers 2) |
|
|
|
2 |
5 |
8.b If
you scored 1-3 please state why this was the case and how this could be
improved |
|||||
9.a I was
able to complete the tasks between meetings
( no answers 2) |
|
|
|
1 |
6 |
9.b If
you scored 1-3 please state the reasons for not being able to complete all
the tasks |
|||||
10.a I
was able to communicate easily with other members between meetings (no answers 2) |
|
|
|
1 |
6 |
10.b List
the communication method you used: e-mails, sms, phone,
discussion, brainstorming, presentation, skype |