Comenius   OMAC

 

Debica – Poland   21-25 oct 2008

Results (data processed:5th December, 2008)

 

 

Stage 1.- Evaluation of the partnership meeting

 

 

Project

Comenius – Multilateral patnership

Name

OMAC   -   Open minds for active citizenship

Country and City visited

Poland - Debica

Date

21-25 October 2008

 

 

Were the aim and the objectives of the meeting clear?      Yes  - Nr.  9   -   100%

 

 

Did you feel the aims of the meeting were met?               Yes  - Nr.  9   -   100%

 

 

 

Rate the answer 1-5 where 1 is poor and 5 is excellent

1

2

3

4

5

There was sufficient time allocated for the meetings       Nr

 

 

 

4

5

The visit to the learning center was informative    Nr

 

 

 

2

7

I enjoyed the social and cultural programme    Nr

 

 

 

5

4

There was a good balance between social and business activities    Nr

 

 

1

2

6

The information I received from the host country was adequate    Nr

 

 

 

1

7

Should partners do anything differently for next meeting?       No 6          Yes 1

(time for personal introduction and presentations of personal project aims and ideas) 1

(longer time for the meetings among partners)  1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stage 2 – Evaluation of the effectiveness of meetings

Part A to be completed at the end of the partner meeting

 

Rate the answer 1-5 where 1 is poor and 5 is excellent

1

2

3

4

5

1a. Group members worked well together

 

 

1

2

6

1b.  If you scored 1-3 please comment why, if you scored 4-5 give examples of effective working

Not everybody could communicate in English  1

Effective work on steps, aims, objectives and deadlines of the project   6

Organization and content   1

Presentation by students    1

 

 

 

2a. I was given the opportunity to contribute to the meetings

 

 

 

 

9

3a. I was able to contribute to the meetings

 

 

 

 

9

4a There was mutual respect between team members

 

 

 

 

9

4b. If you scored 1-3 please state how this could be improved

 

 

 

 

5a. I feel progress has been made in comparison with the project plan

 

 

 

1

8

5b. If you scored 1-3 please state why and how this could be improved

 

 

 

 

6a I am better informed about some learning environments in other countries I visited   (no answer 2)

 

 

 

4

7

6b. Please share your experience

Informal talks  1

Our students shared experience with students of host school  2

It is our first visit  1

Educational system is quite similar in many European countries  1

No answers  4

 

 

 

 

7a. I am more aware of some of the constraints/barriers which exist in a multi-cultural project

 

 

2

3

4

7b. Give examples of some of the constraints/barriers encountered

Different age of students, languages, types of schools  1

Our student’s English isn’t sufficient  1

Large number of schools involved  1

Different teaching experiences  1 

Lack of time  1

Discovery of similarities  1

No answers  3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Part B to be completed at the end of  the partner meeting

 

Rate the answer 1-5 where 1 is poor and 5 is excellent

1

2

3

4

5

8.a I was clear about the activities/tasks that I had to perform between meetings       (no answers 2)

 

 

 

2

5

8.b If you scored 1-3 please state why this was the case and how this could be improved

 

 

 

 

9.a I was able to complete the tasks between meetings

           ( no answers  2)

 

 

 

1

6

9.b If you scored 1-3 please state the reasons for not being able to complete all the tasks

 

 

 

 

10.a I was able to communicate easily with other members between meetings   (no answers   2)

 

 

 

1

6

10.b List the communication method you used:

e-mails, sms, phone, discussion, brainstorming, presentation, skype

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                                                                    back